A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research: Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Documents
- Fulltext
Accepted author manuscript, 1.79 MB, PDF document
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Science |
Volume | 377 |
Issue number | 6614 |
Pages (from-to) | 1492-1495 |
Number of pages | 4 |
ISSN | 0036-8075 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:
There are three pillars of the science infrastructure that need to coordinate policies to achieve excellence in science (2). The first, funding agencies, encourage integrating SG&DA at the beginning of the research process. In 2003, the European Commission (EC) endorsed “questioning systematically whether, and in what sense, sex and gender are relevant in the objectives and methodology of projects.” Other public-funding agencies followed suit with policies implemented at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; 2010), German Research Foundation (DFG; 2020), and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF; 2021), among others (6).
Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk
ID: 326404065