Who Should Get Vaccinated First? Limits of Solidarity during the First Week of the Danish Vaccination Programme

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Who Should Get Vaccinated First? Limits of Solidarity during the First Week of the Danish Vaccination Programme. / Schaeffer, Merlin; Larsen, Mikkel Haderup.

In: European Sociological Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2023, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Schaeffer, M & Larsen, MH 2023, 'Who Should Get Vaccinated First? Limits of Solidarity during the First Week of the Danish Vaccination Programme', European Sociological Review, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac025

APA

Schaeffer, M., & Larsen, M. H. (2023). Who Should Get Vaccinated First? Limits of Solidarity during the First Week of the Danish Vaccination Programme. European Sociological Review, 39(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac025

Vancouver

Schaeffer M, Larsen MH. Who Should Get Vaccinated First? Limits of Solidarity during the First Week of the Danish Vaccination Programme. European Sociological Review. 2023;39(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac025

Author

Schaeffer, Merlin ; Larsen, Mikkel Haderup. / Who Should Get Vaccinated First? Limits of Solidarity during the First Week of the Danish Vaccination Programme. In: European Sociological Review. 2023 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 1-13.

Bibtex

@article{df91ff84a1b24d459c520539be1ae8dd,
title = "Who Should Get Vaccinated First?: Limits of Solidarity during the First Week of the Danish Vaccination Programme",
abstract = "The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in several acute shortages of healthcare provision and thereby posed a challenge to solidarity among citizens of welfare states. One example was the limited number of vaccine batches at the outset of European COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. This resulted in a rare constellation in which citizens faced both a unifying collective threat but also a scarcity of healthcare resources that necessitated the prioritization of certain groups for an early vaccination. On that premise, we conducted a survey experiment during the first week of the Danish vaccination programme. Our results demonstrate that citizens judged who deserves early access to preventive healthcare along established lines of welfare chauvinism. Fictitious diabetes patients with a Muslim name and those who recently immigrated were regarded as less deserving of an early vaccination. That said, concerns over responsibility for one{\textquoteright}s hardship and anti-social free-rider behaviour drive citizens considerations, too. Contra our hypotheses, we find only weak evidence that immigrants or Muslims are penalized more harshly for an irresponsible lifestyle or free-rider behaviour. Compared with previous research, we study a unique moment in history and are the first to disentangle minority status from stereotypes about their anti-social free-riding behaviour and irresponsibly unhealthy lifestyles.",
author = "Merlin Schaeffer and Larsen, {Mikkel Haderup}",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1093/esr/jcac025",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "European Sociological Review",
issn = "0266-7215",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who Should Get Vaccinated First?

T2 - Limits of Solidarity during the First Week of the Danish Vaccination Programme

AU - Schaeffer, Merlin

AU - Larsen, Mikkel Haderup

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in several acute shortages of healthcare provision and thereby posed a challenge to solidarity among citizens of welfare states. One example was the limited number of vaccine batches at the outset of European COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. This resulted in a rare constellation in which citizens faced both a unifying collective threat but also a scarcity of healthcare resources that necessitated the prioritization of certain groups for an early vaccination. On that premise, we conducted a survey experiment during the first week of the Danish vaccination programme. Our results demonstrate that citizens judged who deserves early access to preventive healthcare along established lines of welfare chauvinism. Fictitious diabetes patients with a Muslim name and those who recently immigrated were regarded as less deserving of an early vaccination. That said, concerns over responsibility for one’s hardship and anti-social free-rider behaviour drive citizens considerations, too. Contra our hypotheses, we find only weak evidence that immigrants or Muslims are penalized more harshly for an irresponsible lifestyle or free-rider behaviour. Compared with previous research, we study a unique moment in history and are the first to disentangle minority status from stereotypes about their anti-social free-riding behaviour and irresponsibly unhealthy lifestyles.

AB - The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in several acute shortages of healthcare provision and thereby posed a challenge to solidarity among citizens of welfare states. One example was the limited number of vaccine batches at the outset of European COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. This resulted in a rare constellation in which citizens faced both a unifying collective threat but also a scarcity of healthcare resources that necessitated the prioritization of certain groups for an early vaccination. On that premise, we conducted a survey experiment during the first week of the Danish vaccination programme. Our results demonstrate that citizens judged who deserves early access to preventive healthcare along established lines of welfare chauvinism. Fictitious diabetes patients with a Muslim name and those who recently immigrated were regarded as less deserving of an early vaccination. That said, concerns over responsibility for one’s hardship and anti-social free-rider behaviour drive citizens considerations, too. Contra our hypotheses, we find only weak evidence that immigrants or Muslims are penalized more harshly for an irresponsible lifestyle or free-rider behaviour. Compared with previous research, we study a unique moment in history and are the first to disentangle minority status from stereotypes about their anti-social free-riding behaviour and irresponsibly unhealthy lifestyles.

U2 - 10.1093/esr/jcac025

DO - 10.1093/esr/jcac025

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - European Sociological Review

JF - European Sociological Review

SN - 0266-7215

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 327146112