The effectiveness of backward contact tracing in networks
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
The effectiveness of backward contact tracing in networks. / Kojaku, Sadamori; Hébert-Dufresne, Laurent; Mones, Enys; Lehmann, Sune; Ahn, Yong Yeol.
In: Nature Physics, Vol. 17, 2021, p. 652-658.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The effectiveness of backward contact tracing in networks
AU - Kojaku, Sadamori
AU - Hébert-Dufresne, Laurent
AU - Mones, Enys
AU - Lehmann, Sune
AU - Ahn, Yong Yeol
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Effective control of an epidemic relies on the rapid discovery and isolation of infected individuals. Because many infectious diseases spread through interaction, contact tracing is widely used to facilitate case discovery and control. However, what determines the efficacy of contact tracing has not been fully understood. Here we reveal that, compared with ‘forward’ tracing (tracing to whom disease spreads), ‘backward’ tracing (tracing from whom disease spreads) is profoundly more effective. The effectiveness of backward tracing is due to simple but overlooked biases arising from the heterogeneity in contacts. We argue that, even if the directionality of infection is unknown, it is possible to perform backward-aiming contact tracing. Using simulations on both synthetic and high-resolution empirical contact datasets, we show that strategically executed contact tracing can prevent a substantial fraction of transmissions with a higher efficiency—in terms of prevented cases per isolation—than case isolation alone. Our results call for a revision of current contact-tracing strategies so that they leverage all forms of bias. It is particularly crucial that we incorporate backward and deep tracing in a digital context while adhering to the privacy-preserving requirements of these new platforms.
AB - Effective control of an epidemic relies on the rapid discovery and isolation of infected individuals. Because many infectious diseases spread through interaction, contact tracing is widely used to facilitate case discovery and control. However, what determines the efficacy of contact tracing has not been fully understood. Here we reveal that, compared with ‘forward’ tracing (tracing to whom disease spreads), ‘backward’ tracing (tracing from whom disease spreads) is profoundly more effective. The effectiveness of backward tracing is due to simple but overlooked biases arising from the heterogeneity in contacts. We argue that, even if the directionality of infection is unknown, it is possible to perform backward-aiming contact tracing. Using simulations on both synthetic and high-resolution empirical contact datasets, we show that strategically executed contact tracing can prevent a substantial fraction of transmissions with a higher efficiency—in terms of prevented cases per isolation—than case isolation alone. Our results call for a revision of current contact-tracing strategies so that they leverage all forms of bias. It is particularly crucial that we incorporate backward and deep tracing in a digital context while adhering to the privacy-preserving requirements of these new platforms.
U2 - 10.1038/s41567-021-01187-2
DO - 10.1038/s41567-021-01187-2
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85101742748
VL - 17
SP - 652
EP - 658
JO - Nature Physics
JF - Nature Physics
SN - 1745-2473
ER -
ID: 350934973