Memory and Culture in Social Movements

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Standard

Memory and Culture in Social Movements. / Doerr, Nicole.

Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research. ed. / B Baumgarten; P. Daphi; P. Ullrich. Springer, 2014. p. 206-226.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Doerr, N 2014, Memory and Culture in Social Movements. in B Baumgarten, P Daphi & P Ullrich (eds), Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research. Springer, pp. 206-226.

APA

Doerr, N. (2014). Memory and Culture in Social Movements. In B. Baumgarten, P. Daphi, & P. Ullrich (Eds.), Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research (pp. 206-226). Springer.

Vancouver

Doerr N. Memory and Culture in Social Movements. In Baumgarten B, Daphi P, Ullrich P, editors, Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research. Springer. 2014. p. 206-226

Author

Doerr, Nicole. / Memory and Culture in Social Movements. Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research. editor / B Baumgarten ; P. Daphi ; P. Ullrich. Springer, 2014. pp. 206-226

Bibtex

@inbook{154f6b0af8ec4c038023c5cf9d5f7461,
title = "Memory and Culture in Social Movements",
abstract = "When telling alternative stories on the Internet and in street protest, activists publicize memories excluded from national history books and mainstream media audiences. At the same time, officials also publicize claims for apology and repair in official public commemorations created for reconciliation. How do social movements construct and use memory, and how does the politics of memory shape cultural meaning-making in movements? To begin answering this question, my contribution brings together a cultural sociology of social movements with an interdisciplinary analysis of memory drawing on psychoanalytical, visual, and historical approaches. Movement scholars who focused on narrative, discourse, framing, and performance show how activists actively construct and mobilize collective memory. We know much less, however, about interactions between multiple layers and forms of remembering stored in images, stories, or performances, or discursive forms. How do conflicting or contradictory memories about the past inside movement groups condition activists{\textquoteright} ability to speak, write, and even think about the future? While previous work conceived of memory in movements as a subcategory of narrative, discourse, and framing, my central point is to understand how memory itself structures these forms of meaning-making — as an independent and multidimensional category of cultural analysis.",
author = "Nicole Doerr",
year = "2014",
language = "Dansk",
pages = "206--226",
editor = "B Baumgarten and P. Daphi and P. Ullrich",
booktitle = "Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research",
publisher = "Springer",
address = "Schweiz",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Memory and Culture in Social Movements

AU - Doerr, Nicole

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - When telling alternative stories on the Internet and in street protest, activists publicize memories excluded from national history books and mainstream media audiences. At the same time, officials also publicize claims for apology and repair in official public commemorations created for reconciliation. How do social movements construct and use memory, and how does the politics of memory shape cultural meaning-making in movements? To begin answering this question, my contribution brings together a cultural sociology of social movements with an interdisciplinary analysis of memory drawing on psychoanalytical, visual, and historical approaches. Movement scholars who focused on narrative, discourse, framing, and performance show how activists actively construct and mobilize collective memory. We know much less, however, about interactions between multiple layers and forms of remembering stored in images, stories, or performances, or discursive forms. How do conflicting or contradictory memories about the past inside movement groups condition activists’ ability to speak, write, and even think about the future? While previous work conceived of memory in movements as a subcategory of narrative, discourse, and framing, my central point is to understand how memory itself structures these forms of meaning-making — as an independent and multidimensional category of cultural analysis.

AB - When telling alternative stories on the Internet and in street protest, activists publicize memories excluded from national history books and mainstream media audiences. At the same time, officials also publicize claims for apology and repair in official public commemorations created for reconciliation. How do social movements construct and use memory, and how does the politics of memory shape cultural meaning-making in movements? To begin answering this question, my contribution brings together a cultural sociology of social movements with an interdisciplinary analysis of memory drawing on psychoanalytical, visual, and historical approaches. Movement scholars who focused on narrative, discourse, framing, and performance show how activists actively construct and mobilize collective memory. We know much less, however, about interactions between multiple layers and forms of remembering stored in images, stories, or performances, or discursive forms. How do conflicting or contradictory memories about the past inside movement groups condition activists’ ability to speak, write, and even think about the future? While previous work conceived of memory in movements as a subcategory of narrative, discourse, and framing, my central point is to understand how memory itself structures these forms of meaning-making — as an independent and multidimensional category of cultural analysis.

M3 - Bidrag til bog/antologi

SP - 206

EP - 226

BT - Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research

A2 - Baumgarten, B

A2 - Daphi, P.

A2 - Ullrich, P.

PB - Springer

ER -

ID: 184389717