Machine learning and social theory: Collective machine behaviour in algorithmic trading

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Machine learning and social theory : Collective machine behaviour in algorithmic trading. / Borch, Christian.

In: European Journal of Social Theory, 2021, p. 136843102110560.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Borch, C 2021, 'Machine learning and social theory: Collective machine behaviour in algorithmic trading', European Journal of Social Theory, pp. 136843102110560. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310211056010

APA

Borch, C. (2021). Machine learning and social theory: Collective machine behaviour in algorithmic trading. European Journal of Social Theory, 136843102110560. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310211056010

Vancouver

Borch C. Machine learning and social theory: Collective machine behaviour in algorithmic trading. European Journal of Social Theory. 2021;136843102110560. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310211056010

Author

Borch, Christian. / Machine learning and social theory : Collective machine behaviour in algorithmic trading. In: European Journal of Social Theory. 2021 ; pp. 136843102110560.

Bibtex

@article{8165792c2ddb44a8bd44984fd61e2601,
title = "Machine learning and social theory: Collective machine behaviour in algorithmic trading",
abstract = "This article examines what the rise in machine learning (ML) systems might mean for social theory. Focusing on financial markets, in which algorithmic securities trading founded on ML-based decision-making is gaining traction, I discuss the extent to which established sociological notions remain relevant or demand a reconsideration when applied to an ML context. I argue that ML systems have some capacity for agency and for engaging in forms of collective machine behaviour, in which ML systems interact with other machines. However, ML-based collective machine behaviour is irreducible to human decision-making and thereby challenges established sociological notions of financial markets (including that of embeddedness). I argue that such behaviour can nonetheless be analysed through an adaptation of sociological theories of interaction and collective behaviour.",
author = "Christian Borch",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1177/13684310211056010",
language = "English",
pages = "136843102110560",
journal = "European Journal of Social Theory",
issn = "1368-4310",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Machine learning and social theory

T2 - Collective machine behaviour in algorithmic trading

AU - Borch, Christian

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This article examines what the rise in machine learning (ML) systems might mean for social theory. Focusing on financial markets, in which algorithmic securities trading founded on ML-based decision-making is gaining traction, I discuss the extent to which established sociological notions remain relevant or demand a reconsideration when applied to an ML context. I argue that ML systems have some capacity for agency and for engaging in forms of collective machine behaviour, in which ML systems interact with other machines. However, ML-based collective machine behaviour is irreducible to human decision-making and thereby challenges established sociological notions of financial markets (including that of embeddedness). I argue that such behaviour can nonetheless be analysed through an adaptation of sociological theories of interaction and collective behaviour.

AB - This article examines what the rise in machine learning (ML) systems might mean for social theory. Focusing on financial markets, in which algorithmic securities trading founded on ML-based decision-making is gaining traction, I discuss the extent to which established sociological notions remain relevant or demand a reconsideration when applied to an ML context. I argue that ML systems have some capacity for agency and for engaging in forms of collective machine behaviour, in which ML systems interact with other machines. However, ML-based collective machine behaviour is irreducible to human decision-making and thereby challenges established sociological notions of financial markets (including that of embeddedness). I argue that such behaviour can nonetheless be analysed through an adaptation of sociological theories of interaction and collective behaviour.

U2 - 10.1177/13684310211056010

DO - 10.1177/13684310211056010

M3 - Journal article

SP - 136843102110560

JO - European Journal of Social Theory

JF - European Journal of Social Theory

SN - 1368-4310

ER -

ID: 319888635