Gender-related variables for health research

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Gender-related variables for health research. / Nielsen, Mathias Wullum; Stefanick, Marcia; Peragine, Diana; Neilands, Torsten B.; Ioannidis, John P. A.; Pilote, Louise; Prochaska, Judith J.; Cullen, Mark R.; Einstein, Gillian; Klinge, Ineke; LeBlanc, Hanna; Paik, Hee Young; Schiebinger, Londa.

In: Biology of Sex Differences, Vol. 12, No. 23, 22.02.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Nielsen, MW, Stefanick, M, Peragine, D, Neilands, TB, Ioannidis, JPA, Pilote, L, Prochaska, JJ, Cullen, MR, Einstein, G, Klinge, I, LeBlanc, H, Paik, HY & Schiebinger, L 2021, 'Gender-related variables for health research', Biology of Sex Differences, vol. 12, no. 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00366-3

APA

Nielsen, M. W., Stefanick, M., Peragine, D., Neilands, T. B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Pilote, L., Prochaska, J. J., Cullen, M. R., Einstein, G., Klinge, I., LeBlanc, H., Paik, H. Y., & Schiebinger, L. (2021). Gender-related variables for health research. Biology of Sex Differences, 12(23). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00366-3

Vancouver

Nielsen MW, Stefanick M, Peragine D, Neilands TB, Ioannidis JPA, Pilote L et al. Gender-related variables for health research. Biology of Sex Differences. 2021 Feb 22;12(23). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00366-3

Author

Nielsen, Mathias Wullum ; Stefanick, Marcia ; Peragine, Diana ; Neilands, Torsten B. ; Ioannidis, John P. A. ; Pilote, Louise ; Prochaska, Judith J. ; Cullen, Mark R. ; Einstein, Gillian ; Klinge, Ineke ; LeBlanc, Hanna ; Paik, Hee Young ; Schiebinger, Londa. / Gender-related variables for health research. In: Biology of Sex Differences. 2021 ; Vol. 12, No. 23.

Bibtex

@article{f1c1718761194d1284f8603204478b5b,
title = "Gender-related variables for health research",
abstract = "BackgroundIn this paper, we argue for Gender as a Sociocultural Variable (GASV) as a complement to Sex as a Biological Variable (SABV). Sex (biology) and gender (sociocultural behaviors and attitudes) interact to influence health and disease processes across the lifespan—which is currently playing out in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study develops a gender assessment tool—the Stanford Gender-Related Variables for Health Research—for use in clinical and population research, including large-scale health surveys involving diverse Western populations. While analyzing sex as a biological variable is widely mandated, gender as a sociocultural variable is not, largely because the field lacks quantitative tools for analyzing the influence of gender on health outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive review of English-language measures of gender from 1975 to 2015 to identify variables across three domains: gender norms, gender-related traits, and gender relations. This yielded 11 variables tested with 44 items in three US cross-sectional survey populations: two internet-based (N = 2051; N = 2135) and a patient-research registry (N = 489), conducted between May 2017 and January 2018.ResultsExploratory and confirmatory factor analyses reduced 11 constructs to 7 gender-related variables: caregiver strain, work strain, independence, risk-taking, emotional intelligence, social support, and discrimination. Regression analyses, adjusted for age, ethnicity, income, education, sex assigned at birth, and self-reported gender identity, identified associations between these gender-related variables and self-rated general health, physical and mental health, and health-risk behaviors.ConclusionOur new instrument represents an important step toward developing more comprehensive and precise survey-based measures of gender in relation to health. Our questionnaire is designed to shed light on how specific gender-related behaviors and attitudes contribute to health and disease processes, irrespective of—or in addition to—biological sex and self-reported gender identity. Use of these gender-related variables in experimental studies, such as clinical trials, may also help us understand if gender factors play an important role as treatment-effect modifiers and would thus need to be further considered in treatment decision-making.",
author = "Nielsen, {Mathias Wullum} and Marcia Stefanick and Diana Peragine and Neilands, {Torsten B.} and Ioannidis, {John P. A.} and Louise Pilote and Prochaska, {Judith J.} and Cullen, {Mark R.} and Gillian Einstein and Ineke Klinge and Hanna LeBlanc and Paik, {Hee Young} and Londa Schiebinger",
year = "2021",
month = feb,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/s13293-021-00366-3",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Biology of Sex Differences",
issn = "2042-6410",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "23",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender-related variables for health research

AU - Nielsen, Mathias Wullum

AU - Stefanick, Marcia

AU - Peragine, Diana

AU - Neilands, Torsten B.

AU - Ioannidis, John P. A.

AU - Pilote, Louise

AU - Prochaska, Judith J.

AU - Cullen, Mark R.

AU - Einstein, Gillian

AU - Klinge, Ineke

AU - LeBlanc, Hanna

AU - Paik, Hee Young

AU - Schiebinger, Londa

PY - 2021/2/22

Y1 - 2021/2/22

N2 - BackgroundIn this paper, we argue for Gender as a Sociocultural Variable (GASV) as a complement to Sex as a Biological Variable (SABV). Sex (biology) and gender (sociocultural behaviors and attitudes) interact to influence health and disease processes across the lifespan—which is currently playing out in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study develops a gender assessment tool—the Stanford Gender-Related Variables for Health Research—for use in clinical and population research, including large-scale health surveys involving diverse Western populations. While analyzing sex as a biological variable is widely mandated, gender as a sociocultural variable is not, largely because the field lacks quantitative tools for analyzing the influence of gender on health outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive review of English-language measures of gender from 1975 to 2015 to identify variables across three domains: gender norms, gender-related traits, and gender relations. This yielded 11 variables tested with 44 items in three US cross-sectional survey populations: two internet-based (N = 2051; N = 2135) and a patient-research registry (N = 489), conducted between May 2017 and January 2018.ResultsExploratory and confirmatory factor analyses reduced 11 constructs to 7 gender-related variables: caregiver strain, work strain, independence, risk-taking, emotional intelligence, social support, and discrimination. Regression analyses, adjusted for age, ethnicity, income, education, sex assigned at birth, and self-reported gender identity, identified associations between these gender-related variables and self-rated general health, physical and mental health, and health-risk behaviors.ConclusionOur new instrument represents an important step toward developing more comprehensive and precise survey-based measures of gender in relation to health. Our questionnaire is designed to shed light on how specific gender-related behaviors and attitudes contribute to health and disease processes, irrespective of—or in addition to—biological sex and self-reported gender identity. Use of these gender-related variables in experimental studies, such as clinical trials, may also help us understand if gender factors play an important role as treatment-effect modifiers and would thus need to be further considered in treatment decision-making.

AB - BackgroundIn this paper, we argue for Gender as a Sociocultural Variable (GASV) as a complement to Sex as a Biological Variable (SABV). Sex (biology) and gender (sociocultural behaviors and attitudes) interact to influence health and disease processes across the lifespan—which is currently playing out in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study develops a gender assessment tool—the Stanford Gender-Related Variables for Health Research—for use in clinical and population research, including large-scale health surveys involving diverse Western populations. While analyzing sex as a biological variable is widely mandated, gender as a sociocultural variable is not, largely because the field lacks quantitative tools for analyzing the influence of gender on health outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive review of English-language measures of gender from 1975 to 2015 to identify variables across three domains: gender norms, gender-related traits, and gender relations. This yielded 11 variables tested with 44 items in three US cross-sectional survey populations: two internet-based (N = 2051; N = 2135) and a patient-research registry (N = 489), conducted between May 2017 and January 2018.ResultsExploratory and confirmatory factor analyses reduced 11 constructs to 7 gender-related variables: caregiver strain, work strain, independence, risk-taking, emotional intelligence, social support, and discrimination. Regression analyses, adjusted for age, ethnicity, income, education, sex assigned at birth, and self-reported gender identity, identified associations between these gender-related variables and self-rated general health, physical and mental health, and health-risk behaviors.ConclusionOur new instrument represents an important step toward developing more comprehensive and precise survey-based measures of gender in relation to health. Our questionnaire is designed to shed light on how specific gender-related behaviors and attitudes contribute to health and disease processes, irrespective of—or in addition to—biological sex and self-reported gender identity. Use of these gender-related variables in experimental studies, such as clinical trials, may also help us understand if gender factors play an important role as treatment-effect modifiers and would thus need to be further considered in treatment decision-making.

U2 - 10.1186/s13293-021-00366-3

DO - 10.1186/s13293-021-00366-3

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33618769

VL - 12

JO - Biology of Sex Differences

JF - Biology of Sex Differences

SN - 2042-6410

IS - 23

ER -

ID: 258045772