Caring collectives and other forms of bystander helping behavior in violent situations

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Caring collectives and other forms of bystander helping behavior in violent situations. / Bloch, Charlotte; Liebst, Lasse Suonperä; Poder, Poul; Maria Christiansen, Jasmin ; Heinskou, Marie Bruvik.

In: Current Sociology, Vol. 66, No. 7, 2018, p. 1049-1069.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bloch, C, Liebst, LS, Poder, P, Maria Christiansen, J & Heinskou, MB 2018, 'Caring collectives and other forms of bystander helping behavior in violent situations', Current Sociology, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1049-1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118776365

APA

Bloch, C., Liebst, L. S., Poder, P., Maria Christiansen, J., & Heinskou, M. B. (2018). Caring collectives and other forms of bystander helping behavior in violent situations. Current Sociology, 66(7), 1049-1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118776365

Vancouver

Bloch C, Liebst LS, Poder P, Maria Christiansen J, Heinskou MB. Caring collectives and other forms of bystander helping behavior in violent situations. Current Sociology. 2018;66(7):1049-1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118776365

Author

Bloch, Charlotte ; Liebst, Lasse Suonperä ; Poder, Poul ; Maria Christiansen, Jasmin ; Heinskou, Marie Bruvik. / Caring collectives and other forms of bystander helping behavior in violent situations. In: Current Sociology. 2018 ; Vol. 66, No. 7. pp. 1049-1069.

Bibtex

@article{323f1472d5aa4fc385eb79daeeca9f1d,
title = "Caring collectives and other forms of bystander helping behavior in violent situations",
abstract = "Social science research has traditionally described bystanders in violent emergencies as being passive. Recent evidence, however, stresses that bystanders typically intervene proactively and successfully in violent, dangerous emergencies. This article examines the multiple ways bystanders act in situations of violence, with the aim of moving beyond the understanding of bystanders as being either passive or active. Based on a qualitative analysis of surveillance camera recordings of urban public assaults, the study maps different types of bystander behaviors as they unfold in real-life violent events. The first part of the analysis is summarized in a typology that covers three types of bystander action: distancing, ambivalence, and involvement. The second part shows that the involvement action also unfolds through coordinated interactions between the bystanders, what the article characterizes as a {\textquoteleft}caring collective.{\textquoteright} This interactional aspect of bystander involvement has rarely been examined in the bystander literature, which tends to focus on individual bystander actions and motivations.",
author = "Charlotte Bloch and Liebst, {Lasse Suonper{\"a}} and Poul Poder and {Maria Christiansen}, Jasmin and Heinskou, {Marie Bruvik}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1177/0011392118776365",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "1049--1069",
journal = "Current Sociology",
issn = "0011-3921",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Caring collectives and other forms of bystander helping behavior in violent situations

AU - Bloch, Charlotte

AU - Liebst, Lasse Suonperä

AU - Poder, Poul

AU - Maria Christiansen, Jasmin

AU - Heinskou, Marie Bruvik

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Social science research has traditionally described bystanders in violent emergencies as being passive. Recent evidence, however, stresses that bystanders typically intervene proactively and successfully in violent, dangerous emergencies. This article examines the multiple ways bystanders act in situations of violence, with the aim of moving beyond the understanding of bystanders as being either passive or active. Based on a qualitative analysis of surveillance camera recordings of urban public assaults, the study maps different types of bystander behaviors as they unfold in real-life violent events. The first part of the analysis is summarized in a typology that covers three types of bystander action: distancing, ambivalence, and involvement. The second part shows that the involvement action also unfolds through coordinated interactions between the bystanders, what the article characterizes as a ‘caring collective.’ This interactional aspect of bystander involvement has rarely been examined in the bystander literature, which tends to focus on individual bystander actions and motivations.

AB - Social science research has traditionally described bystanders in violent emergencies as being passive. Recent evidence, however, stresses that bystanders typically intervene proactively and successfully in violent, dangerous emergencies. This article examines the multiple ways bystanders act in situations of violence, with the aim of moving beyond the understanding of bystanders as being either passive or active. Based on a qualitative analysis of surveillance camera recordings of urban public assaults, the study maps different types of bystander behaviors as they unfold in real-life violent events. The first part of the analysis is summarized in a typology that covers three types of bystander action: distancing, ambivalence, and involvement. The second part shows that the involvement action also unfolds through coordinated interactions between the bystanders, what the article characterizes as a ‘caring collective.’ This interactional aspect of bystander involvement has rarely been examined in the bystander literature, which tends to focus on individual bystander actions and motivations.

U2 - 10.1177/0011392118776365

DO - 10.1177/0011392118776365

M3 - Journal article

VL - 66

SP - 1049

EP - 1069

JO - Current Sociology

JF - Current Sociology

SN - 0011-3921

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 173743451