Author-level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Author-level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19. / Madsen, Emil Bargmann; Nielsen, Mathias Wullum; Bjornholm, Josefine; Jagsi, Reshma; Andersen, Jens Peter.

In: eLife, Vol. 2022, No. 11, e76559, 16.03.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Madsen, EB, Nielsen, MW, Bjornholm, J, Jagsi, R & Andersen, JP 2022, 'Author-level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19', eLife, vol. 2022, no. 11, e76559. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76559

APA

Madsen, E. B., Nielsen, M. W., Bjornholm, J., Jagsi, R., & Andersen, J. P. (2022). Author-level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19. eLife, 2022(11), [e76559]. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76559

Vancouver

Madsen EB, Nielsen MW, Bjornholm J, Jagsi R, Andersen JP. Author-level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19. eLife. 2022 Mar 16;2022(11). e76559. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76559

Author

Madsen, Emil Bargmann ; Nielsen, Mathias Wullum ; Bjornholm, Josefine ; Jagsi, Reshma ; Andersen, Jens Peter. / Author-level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19. In: eLife. 2022 ; Vol. 2022, No. 11.

Bibtex

@article{0a545fd8541b41679a0e6cc7662f3364,
title = "Author-level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19",
abstract = "Publications are essential for a successful academic career, and there is evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic has amplified existing gender disparities in the publishing process. We used longitudinal publication data on 431,207 authors in four disciplines - basic medicine, biology, chemistry and clinical medicine - to quantify the differential impact of COVID-19 on the annual publishing rates of men and women. In a difference-in-differences analysis, we estimated that the average gender difference in publication productivity increased from -0.26 in 2019 to -0.35 in 2020; this corresponds to the output of women being 17% lower than the output of men in 2109, and 24% lower in 2020. An age-group comparison showed a widening gender gap for both early-career and mid-career scientists. The increasing gender gap was most pronounced among highly productive authors and in biology and clinical medicine. Our study demonstrates the importance of reinforcing institutional commitments to diversity through policies that support the inclusion and retention of women in research.",
keywords = "meta-research, scientific productivity, publishing, gender bias, COVID-19, academia, None, RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY, FACULTY, INEQUALITY, IMPACT",
author = "Madsen, {Emil Bargmann} and Nielsen, {Mathias Wullum} and Josefine Bjornholm and Reshma Jagsi and Andersen, {Jens Peter}",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
day = "16",
doi = "10.7554/eLife.76559",
language = "English",
volume = "2022",
journal = "eLife",
issn = "2050-084X",
publisher = "eLife Sciences Publications Ltd.",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Author-level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19

AU - Madsen, Emil Bargmann

AU - Nielsen, Mathias Wullum

AU - Bjornholm, Josefine

AU - Jagsi, Reshma

AU - Andersen, Jens Peter

PY - 2022/3/16

Y1 - 2022/3/16

N2 - Publications are essential for a successful academic career, and there is evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic has amplified existing gender disparities in the publishing process. We used longitudinal publication data on 431,207 authors in four disciplines - basic medicine, biology, chemistry and clinical medicine - to quantify the differential impact of COVID-19 on the annual publishing rates of men and women. In a difference-in-differences analysis, we estimated that the average gender difference in publication productivity increased from -0.26 in 2019 to -0.35 in 2020; this corresponds to the output of women being 17% lower than the output of men in 2109, and 24% lower in 2020. An age-group comparison showed a widening gender gap for both early-career and mid-career scientists. The increasing gender gap was most pronounced among highly productive authors and in biology and clinical medicine. Our study demonstrates the importance of reinforcing institutional commitments to diversity through policies that support the inclusion and retention of women in research.

AB - Publications are essential for a successful academic career, and there is evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic has amplified existing gender disparities in the publishing process. We used longitudinal publication data on 431,207 authors in four disciplines - basic medicine, biology, chemistry and clinical medicine - to quantify the differential impact of COVID-19 on the annual publishing rates of men and women. In a difference-in-differences analysis, we estimated that the average gender difference in publication productivity increased from -0.26 in 2019 to -0.35 in 2020; this corresponds to the output of women being 17% lower than the output of men in 2109, and 24% lower in 2020. An age-group comparison showed a widening gender gap for both early-career and mid-career scientists. The increasing gender gap was most pronounced among highly productive authors and in biology and clinical medicine. Our study demonstrates the importance of reinforcing institutional commitments to diversity through policies that support the inclusion and retention of women in research.

KW - meta-research

KW - scientific productivity

KW - publishing

KW - gender bias

KW - COVID-19

KW - academia

KW - None

KW - RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY

KW - FACULTY

KW - INEQUALITY

KW - IMPACT

U2 - 10.7554/eLife.76559

DO - 10.7554/eLife.76559

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35293860

VL - 2022

JO - eLife

JF - eLife

SN - 2050-084X

IS - 11

M1 - e76559

ER -

ID: 304366086