Standard
What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review. / Jakobsen, Terne Sasha Thorn; Rogers, Anna.
2022. 4810-4823 Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Seattle, United States.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research
Harvard
Jakobsen, TST & Rogers, A 2022, '
What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review', Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Seattle, United States,
10/07/2022 -
15/07/2022 pp. 4810-4823.
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.354
APA
Jakobsen, T. S. T., & Rogers, A. (2022).
What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review. 4810-4823. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Seattle, United States.
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.354
Vancouver
Jakobsen TST, Rogers A.
What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review. 2022. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Seattle, United States.
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.354
Author
Jakobsen, Terne Sasha Thorn ; Rogers, Anna. / What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Seattle, United States.
Bibtex
@conference{1a87fefc8b014a4398bb54e8da376bcc,
title = "What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review",
abstract = "Both scientific progress and individual researcher careers depend on the quality of peer review, which in turn depends on paper-reviewer matching. Surprisingly, this problem has been mostly approached as an automated recommendation problem rather than as a matter where different stakeholders (area chairs, reviewers, authors) have accumulated experience worth taking into account. We present the results of the first survey of the NLP community, identifying common issues and perspectives on what factors should be considered by paper-reviewer matching systems. This study contributes actionable recommendations for improving future NLP conferences, and desiderata for interpretable peer review assignments.",
author = "Jakobsen, {Terne Sasha Thorn} and Anna Rogers",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.354",
language = "English",
pages = "4810--4823",
note = "null ; Conference date: 10-07-2022 Through 15-07-2022",
}
RIS
TY - CONF
T1 - What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review
AU - Jakobsen, Terne Sasha Thorn
AU - Rogers, Anna
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Both scientific progress and individual researcher careers depend on the quality of peer review, which in turn depends on paper-reviewer matching. Surprisingly, this problem has been mostly approached as an automated recommendation problem rather than as a matter where different stakeholders (area chairs, reviewers, authors) have accumulated experience worth taking into account. We present the results of the first survey of the NLP community, identifying common issues and perspectives on what factors should be considered by paper-reviewer matching systems. This study contributes actionable recommendations for improving future NLP conferences, and desiderata for interpretable peer review assignments.
AB - Both scientific progress and individual researcher careers depend on the quality of peer review, which in turn depends on paper-reviewer matching. Surprisingly, this problem has been mostly approached as an automated recommendation problem rather than as a matter where different stakeholders (area chairs, reviewers, authors) have accumulated experience worth taking into account. We present the results of the first survey of the NLP community, identifying common issues and perspectives on what factors should be considered by paper-reviewer matching systems. This study contributes actionable recommendations for improving future NLP conferences, and desiderata for interpretable peer review assignments.
U2 - 10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.354
DO - 10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.354
M3 - Paper
SP - 4810
EP - 4823
Y2 - 10 July 2022 through 15 July 2022
ER -
