A framework for sex, gender, and diversity analysis in research: Funding agencies have ample room to improve their policies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.79 MB, PDF document

Original languageEnglish
JournalScience
Volume377
Issue number6614
Pages (from-to)1492-1495
Number of pages4
ISSN0036-8075
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
There are three pillars of the science infrastructure that need to coordinate policies to achieve excellence in science (2). The first, funding agencies, encourage integrating SG&DA at the beginning of the research process. In 2003, the European Commission (EC) endorsed “questioning systematically whether, and in what sense, sex and gender are relevant in the objectives and methodology of projects.” Other public-funding agencies followed suit with policies implemented at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; 2010), German Research Foundation (DFG; 2020), and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF; 2021), among others (6).

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 326404065